What the hell is wrong with half-backs?

The term “half-back” fell out of use by the early 1970s and “midfield” was used in naming the positions that play around the middle third as in centre midfield and wide midfield. The centre midfield position has evolved further with the attacking midfield and defensive midfield variants being recognised in their own right. How-ever, the half-back principle has seen a resurgence with guys like Sergio Busquets and David Luiz playing in said role.

FM describes the role as follows:

The half back looks to serve a role somewhere between that of an aggressive sweeper and a defensive midfielder. With a Half Back, the central defenders themselves will push higher up the pitch while the Half Back drops deeper than a standard defensive midfielder and, in addition to his defensive duties, looks to offer an outlet for quickly recycling possession when the team’s attacking play breaks down.

The half-back in FM is typically a player who will find themselves supporting both their defence and their attack by positioning themselves to hold the midfield. Stamina is the most important attribute for this position as the player will find themselves covering a lot of the pitch, but his positioning, off the ball movement and defensive capabilities will be equally important.

That all sounds fantastic on paper, doesn’t it? Imagine the role working with two central defenders and Cafú / Roberto Carlos -esque wing-backs, surging forward. It really does sound ideal and something I was eager to experiment with. Unfortunately, SI have dropped the ball a bit in the actual implementing of the role. Observe.

That’s my team on the attack there. As you might expect, the half-back ventures forward, trying to link up with the midfielders. As I mentioned earlier,surging wing-backs. Now look at the positioning of the two central defenders. There’s a gap between them wide enough to sail an aircraft-carrier through…

I do get it, sort of… I really do… When the half-back drops back, it makes sense that the two defenders will drop wider a bit, to make room for the half-back. What makes no fucking sense at all, is that they maintain their wide shape when the half-back has ventured further forward… Imagine the carnage a long ball towards a fast striker down the center of the pitch could cause now… Why can’t the two central defenders maintain a more narrow defensive shape when their own team is on the offense? This is just asking for a lethal counter-attack.

How are we supposed to implement this role if SI can’t get it right in the ME?

Table of Contents

Guido

Guido is the founding father of Strikerless and main nutjob running the show.

Strikerless

TLDR; Download-links

I have debated whether or not to post this article. Should I offer a downloadable version of my tactics, just for people to generally ignore why they work in a specific way and complain to yours truly about their perceived lack of progress or success? Ultimately, there is no right or wrong way to approach things with FM. If you're getting more success from downloadable tactics and that feels fulfilling enough, then crack on. This article contains links to the latest formation of my "Riders (on the storm)" series of tactics, using both a deep and middle block in defence.

Strikerless

A Tactical Roadmap To Evolution

As my tactics setup evolved and developed, I noticed my build-up from the back was far too easily disrupted by high-intensity pressing sides. They targeted my deep-lying playmaker and, at times, my ball-playing defender. Players Read more…

Set Pieces

My Throw-In Setups For FM23

Set pieces in football, and thus in Football Manager, have received much attention and study. But what about the innocuous throw-in? Apart from when a team develops a long throw-in programme (see Delap, Rory, or last year’s trebuchet-styled throw-ins), it is largely ignored. This doesn’t do the humble throw-in justice, as they are essential to your Football Manager game. Just throwing the ball somewhere willy-nilly not only robs you of a potential goalscoring opportunity (depending on your location, of course), but it also increases your risk of losing the ball and ending up on the wrong side of a devastating counter-attack. So again, throw-ins are far more important than you might think.